Some small programming tool (nicer than Q/QuickBASIC) which had a nice facility for creating a Text UI could be useful.
I don't think any of these would fit on a floppy, though; you'd have to unwind a little bit for that. Say, Turbo Pascal 5.5?
Or ditch DOS and embrace Wirth's Oberon (the OS and language).
There is a one-floppy build.
torginus•5h ago
In these scenarios, having another layer of memory protection and pre-emptive multi-process multitasking might be completely unnecessary.
arghwhat•5h ago
FreeDOS has no technical relevance other than its intended purpose of continued support for legacy DOS applications on modern hardware - which is perfectly fine.
gwbas1c•4h ago
sirwhinesalot•4h ago
p_ing•4h ago
https://dosbox-x.com/
bni•4h ago
denkmoon•4h ago
arghwhat•4h ago
dspillett•5h ago
Even if they were not the case I think it would only have any use between containers and full VMs when you want more separation than the former but less weight than the latter, and there are various existing microVM options that seem to have a handle on that space.
diggan•4h ago
Well, just yesterday I had to run FreeDOS from a USB in order to run a sas2flash utility that didn't run on Linux or directly via UEFI, so I could flash some firmware to a SAS controller. Seems at least some of us still need it :)
Btw, avoid getting a SAS controller if you can, and get a motherboard that directly supports as many SATA drives as you need. Few things have been as frustrating as dealing with this SAS controller thing.
vin047•4h ago
diggan•2h ago
So ultimately I used FreeDOS to finally be able to run sas2flash, so I could flash the IT firmware. Maybe I'm spoiled, but overall it's been a somewhat confusing journey.
And today I also started looking into getting LTO8 for long-term backups, probably will be even worse, judging by the docs I've gone through so far...
rekoil•4h ago
diggan•2h ago