frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Blatant AI slop just won a 25k USD DeepMind Kaggle Grand Prize

https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/discussion/724918#3498423
315•twerkmeister•2h ago•176 comments

Minikotlin

https://minikotlin.run
38•frizlab•1h ago•8 comments

Multi-Primary Color Display Emerges as Next-Gen Color Reproduction Technology

https://en.ubiresearchnet.com/multi-primary-color-display-technology-2026/
12•ksec•50m ago•6 comments

Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence

https://www.kimi.com/blog/kimi-k3
1812•vincent_s•23h ago•1062 comments

EEG shows brain can simultaneous encode two speech streams

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003876
171•giuliomagnifico•8h ago•104 comments

Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters

https://www.ft.com/content/1b8c9d52-88a9-426b-ba47-f1811f859166
94•merksittich•1h ago•52 comments

Manufact (YC S25) Is Hiring a Senior infra engineer to build the MCP cloud

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/manufact/jobs/Dh6PYP5-senior-infrastructure-engineer
1•luigipederzani•30m ago

VulnHunter: Capital One's agentic AI code security tool

https://www.capitalone.com/tech/open-source/announcing-vulnhunter/
11•medina•1h ago•2 comments

Pebble Mega Update – July 2026

https://repebble.com/blog/pebble-mega-update-july-2026
174•crazysaem•9h ago•89 comments

After wearing the Pebble Time 2 for two weeks, I'll never buy another smartwatch

https://www.androidauthority.com/pebble-time-2-smartwatch-hands-on-3680077/
40•jethronethro•2d ago•18 comments

How Has Roman Concrete Lasted for Millennia? 1,900-Year-Old Latrine Offers Clues

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-has-roman-concrete-lasted-for-millennia-a-1900-year...
184•divbzero•10h ago•141 comments

Microsoft Comic Chat is now open source

https://opensource.microsoft.com/blog/2026/07/16/microsoft-comic-chat-is-now-open-source/
737•jervant•21h ago•159 comments

Decoy Font

https://www.mixfont.com/experiments/decoy-font
617•ray__•21h ago•142 comments

An Engineer's Guide to USB Typе-С (2024)

https://www.ti.com/lit/eb/slyy228/slyy228.pdf?ts=1759892558029
222•gregsadetsky•6d ago•30 comments

Ask HN: Any AWS billing issues known? Amazon forecast of 3 billion dollars

123•mstolpm•3h ago•64 comments

Turn your singing voice into printable notes (in the browser)

https://om-intelligence.ch/projects/vocal-notation/vocal-notation.html
55•busssard•3d ago•21 comments

Camera Chase Vehicle

https://transistor-man.com/gimbal_camera_rover.html
66•geerlingguy•1w ago•8 comments

LM Studio Bionic: the AI agent for open models

https://lmstudio.ai/blog/introducing-lm-studio-bionic
287•minimaxir•17h ago•103 comments

$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol

https://www.tryai.dev/blog/ai-music-video-arena-claude-vs-gpt-5.6
321•hershyb_•17h ago•427 comments

Solod: Go can be a better C

https://solod.dev
171•koeng•3d ago•100 comments

The Little Book of Reinforcement Learning

https://github.com/alxndrTL/little-book-rl/
180•mustaphah•15h ago•20 comments

NotebookLM is now Gemini Notebook

https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/products/gemini-notebook/notebooklm-gemini-notebook/
337•xnx•21h ago•164 comments

Starlink from 1984

https://nemanjatrifunovic.substack.com/p/starlink-from-1984
58•ingve•5d ago•26 comments

I Owe My Life to the Commodore 64

https://www.goto10retro.com/p/i-owe-my-life-to-the-commodore-64
61•ingve•4h ago•41 comments

Immersive Linear Algebra Book with Interactive Figures (2015)

https://immersivemath.com/ila/
255•srean•22h ago•28 comments

Detecting LLM-Generated Texts with “Classical” Machine Learning

https://blog.lyc8503.net/en/post/llm-classifier/
218•uneven9434•21h ago•158 comments

CD sales growth outpaced vinyl in the first half of 2026

https://consequence.net/2026/07/the-cd-revival-is-getting-hard-to-ignore/
145•speckx•20h ago•159 comments

Mathematics of Data Science

https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11938
183•Anon84•17h ago•11 comments

Helium escaping from atmosphere of nearby rocky exoplanet in a habitable zone

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aea9708
130•anyonecancode•17h ago•42 comments

'Likweli': A new monkey species discovered in the Congo Basin

https://news.yale.edu/2026/07/15/meet-likweli-new-monkey-species-discovered-congo-basin
100•gmays•15h ago•25 comments
Open in hackernews

Apple targets dozens of OpenAI employees with legal letters

https://www.ft.com/content/1b8c9d52-88a9-426b-ba47-f1811f859166
88•merksittich•1h ago

Comments

DivingForGold•1h ago
Nag screen, as usual
scrlk•1h ago
https://archive.ph/3J3iw
josefritzishere•1h ago
Wait until it comes out that OpenAI stole trade data through their deal with Atlassian. Seems inevitable. The company is fundamentally criminal in nature.
hmmm3•1h ago
https://archive.ph/zoUde
JKCalhoun•1h ago
How can I say this…? Some companies come across like a neon sign flashing "EVIL!".

It's been nothing but warning signs from this company for at least a year now. I'm so happy to have nothing to do with them (having deleted my account a year or so ago).

Their marketing dept is going to have to really dig to get them out of this hole they've made for themselves.

The idea that I would trust any device they might roll out that is as personal as a personal AI assistant… It's no better than Meta and their creepy glasses.

Yeah, no thanks.

khalic•1h ago
… so… you’re talking about OpenAI or Apple?
plufz•1h ago
From what we know this far it’s quite easy to be on Apples side in this particular question, right?
JKCalhoun•57m ago
Especially since Apple has no history of doing this—suggests this is on another level of theft.

(I worked at Apple and am aware of little "theft" incidents that came and went. Obviously those little incidents never made the news cycle.)

nba456_•41m ago
How could you have worked at Apple during the entire Samsung lawsuit and say Apple has no history of suing competitors over IP theft?
EPWN3D•27m ago
Because Apple didn't sue Samsung over IP theft. They sued them over copyright infringement.
JKCalhoun•8m ago
You're right—I didn't mean to suggest they've never sued competitors. Some companies are just known to be litigious—I've never put Apple in that bucket. (And maybe I have blinders on. It's certainly fair to blame me for being biased.)
deepwoods•1h ago
FT frames this as some aggressive escalation tactic, but document retention letters are extremely standard practice. At this point they're basically a formality, as any former Apple employee at OpenAI really ought to know by now that they could get dragged into this. Hold letters can be aggressive if you send them before you've even filed a complaint, but if anything, Apple is late to the party with these.
hunmernop•1h ago
OpenAI ain’t too open
reenorap•1h ago
Apple must have hard evidence on this. I can’t believe they would take it this far without already knowing they are going to win. If they have to fire a huge chunk of their hardware employees it’s going to throw their IPO plans into chaos.
jstummbillig•44m ago
What do you mean "this far"? How far is this?

Corps lose law suits all the time. They always have to go whatever "this far" is before it happens, surely?

teeray•41m ago
Makes you wonder if they’ll settle for bargain-basement token prices for Apple Intelligence.
dofm•29m ago
I think it is clear that if Apple were going to deal with OpenAI on that level, they already would have. What they wanted for their AI products is a measure of control over their destiny that OpenAI clearly did not want to give them that badly. It's also pretty clear that Apple is willing to work with arch-rivals to supply components of their products, both software and hardware, but values consistency alongside trustworthiness.
moduspol•22m ago
This stuff happened years ago, right? Something tells me that discussion has already happened, and they went with Google.

Besides: Apple is a "real" company that will definitely still be around in five years. They've already fumbled Siri multiple times. IMO Google was certainly the right choice for actually executing well on Apple's own terms for the foreseeable future.

bix6•1h ago
Predictions on who wins? Does Apple actually have a winnable case or are they just throwing a wrench in things?
moralestapia•54m ago
Apple is not the company that makes this sort of thing just for fun.

Also, they don't have a directly competing business with OpenAI, so slander doesn't make sense.

I think this is genuine.

rancar2•45m ago
Oh the irony if Apple can get a larger OpenAI stake than Microsoft.
nojito•44m ago
Both parties will just settle.

Apple already caught former employees accessing the Apple internal network with unreturned laptops after termination that’s pretty much game over.

smith7018•34m ago
Why would Apple settle? They probably want the same outcomes of the Waymo v Uber trial that forced Uber out of the market. Apple's accusations imply that every part of OpenAI's hardware effort has been tainted with Apple's trade secrets and is therefore illegitimate. They also have more money than God so they can keep the suit going as long as they want.
staticman2•12m ago
Uber was not forced to leave the self driving car market by Waymo's litigation. The litigation ended in February 2018 and Uber left the market in December 2020.
pembrook•58m ago
I’m a huge fan of Apple but this kind of thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

Regardless of whether OpenAI poached some of their talent or is the one in the wrong, Apple has such a massively dominant hardware business (some might say monopoly level in some areas) that for them to be publicly acknowledging how scared they are of OpenAI…it’s just…pathetic.

They’re a $5T company and can’t muster up the motivation to get in the game and compete in the next computing frontier.

Apple fanboys will invent some narrative about them swooping in with the best product as a laggard and claim it’s always their strategy, but I see zero evidence they have the capacity to do that anymore.

The Siri situation is just absolutely pathetic and no amount of bad press about OpenAI is going to change the fact that Apple neglecting Siri for a decade now has been a big F-U to their customers.

presbyterian•44m ago
This isn't just them being scared of a competitor because they're able to outperform Apple, according to Apple they have proof of an active plan not just to poach talent, but to get that talent to syphon out information as they leave, as well as former employees keeping Apple hardware and using it to access confidential information. If what Apple claims is true, this is straightforwardly illegal. Could Apple be lying? Maybe, but that's a very risky move.
pembrook•37m ago
It totally could be illegal, and I don’t care. Those laws exist to entrench dominant incumbents, and make our economy less dynamic.

The history of Silicon Valley and most of its innovation come from this kind of thing, and we eliminated non-competes in California for exactly this reason.

Apple having a serious competitor in hardware would be a good thing for consumers all over the world.

Apple’s overzealous secrecy culture starts to become insidious once you become such a dominant force in the marketplace.

At what point do we allow their innovations to bleed into the rest of humanity and lower their margins so humanity doesn’t pay out a 60% tax to them anymore. I think they’ve made enough profits for investors at this point. Id be happy if my Apple stock went nowhere if it meant 20 other companies could grow and innovate new products off the back of it.

ameen•36m ago
Why do I get the sense that OpenAI is gonna run to the administration to broker a deal to prevent “losing competitiveness” in the AI space in the advent of Chinese alternatives like Kimi AI. All they’ll exchange is some stake in OpenAI to TruthSocial or some investment vehicle for 45/47.
speak_plainly•14m ago
I wonder what Jony Ive is thinking about his partnership at the moment.
khalic•18m ago
Yes it was more of a jest than a critique, the comment didn't explicitly say which one it was. In this case, it seems quite clear that Apple has a case.
JKCalhoun•58m ago
Ha ha. Worked at Apple for over two decades—would not have stayed at a company I thought was evil for that long.

A bully at times? I wouldn't argue with that.

yomismoaqui•51m ago
A quick search:

APP STORE, COMPETITION, AND MARKET CONTROL

  - U.S. Department of Justice antitrust lawsuit Accuses Apple of monopolizing
    smartphone markets and anticompetitive behavior.
    https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-apple-monopolizing-smartphone-markets

  - EU Commission DMA breach The European Commission found Apple in breach of
    the Digital Markets Act regarding steering rules.
    https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-finds-apple-and-meta-breach-digital-markets-act

  - Epic Games injunction sanctions Court rules Apple defied App Store order
    regarding external payment links.
    https://apnews.com/article/69b16572d2b2c990f6b69d4bbad9b57b

  - EU €1.8B App Store fine Fined for abusive music-streaming rules and
    preventing cheaper alternative information.
    https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_1161
IPHONE PERFORMANCE AND "BATTERYGATE"

  - Apple Will Finally Pay for Throttling iPhones (WIRED) Apple settled the
    throttling lawsuit for up to $500 million (without admitting guilt).
    https://www.wired.com/story/apple-batterygate-settlement-payments-finally-coming/
RIGHT TO REPAIR AND PARTS PAIRING

  - The End of Parts Pairing? Almost (iFixit) On how software component linking
    forces warnings and loses functionality.
    https://www.ifixit.com/News/100266/the-end-of-parts-pairing-almost

  - Self-Repair Programme Critique (Right to Repair Europe) Critiques
    serialization, remote authorization, and part restrictions.
    https://repair.eu/news/apples-self-repair-programme-is-not-the-right-to-repair-we-need/

  - France is Fighting to Save Your iPhone from an Early Death (WIRED) Regarding
    France's probe into planned obsolescence and parts pairing.
    https://www.wired.com/story/right-to-repair-apple-france/
PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE

  - Apple to pay $95 million to settle Siri privacy lawsuit (Reuters) Lawsuit
    alleging accidental Siri recordings and sharing with third parties.
    https://www.reuters.com/legal/apple-pay-95-million-settle-siri-privacy-lawsuit-2025-01-02/

  - Apple's CSAM On-Device Scanning Critiques (EFF) The Electronic Frontier
    Foundation's critique of Apple's plan to scan photos on-device (later
    dropped).
    https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/apples-plan-think-different-about-encryption-opens-backdoor-your-private-life
LABOR CONDITIONS IN SUPPLY CHAINS

  - Apple Reveals Supply Chain, Details Conditions (Reuters) Early reporting on
    audit findings of child labor and work violations.
    https://www.reuters.com/article/world/uk/apple-reveals-supply-chain-details-conditions-idUSTRE80C1KV/

  - Rights Group Says Apple Suppliers in China Broke Labor Laws (Reuters)
    Reports of excessive overtime and labor violations in Chinese factories.
    https://www.reuters.com/article/business/rights-group-says-apple-suppliers-in-china-breaking-labour-laws-idUSBRE85R0EF/
TAX PRACTICES

  - State aid: Ireland gave illegal tax benefits to Apple worth up to €13
    billion (European Commission) The EC ruling that Ireland gave illegal tax
    benefits to Apple, later upheld.
    https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_16_2923
alansaber•46m ago
Well, just enough evil to increase profit margins.
illliillll•41m ago
None of this seems like it could reasonably be described as evil.
fsflover•29m ago
How about these?

Apple knew a supplier was using child labor but took 3 years to fully cut ties (yahoo.com)

52 points by notRobot on Jan 1, 2021 | un‑favorite | 5 comments

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25607386

Apple's Cooperation with Authoritarian Governments (jessesquires.com)

468 points by ig0r0 on March 31, 2021 | un‑favorite | 291 comments

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26644216

Apple removes nearly 100 VPNs used by Russians to bypass censorship (elpais.com)

31 points by speckx on Oct 1, 2024 | un‑favorite | 3 comments

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41712728

Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA (open-web-advocacy.org)

514 points by yashghelani on July 14, 2025 | un‑favorite | 383 comments

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44557348

Apple defined ICE as a "protected class" in blocking anti-ICE apps (boingboing.net)

146 points by baobun 9 months ago 69 comments

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45520407

https://9to5mac.com/2020/12/29/iphone-workers-forced-labor/

groundzeros2015•30m ago
> Some companies come across like a neon sign flashing "EVIL!".

This is a perception created by your choice of media.

JKCalhoun•7m ago
Probably.

(HackerNews, FWIW.)

testfrequency•39m ago
You’re underestimating how much Apple Legal goes after anyone and everyone they feel a slight wrong sniff about.

I know some insane stories that will never be publicly disclosed for one reason or another, and…it’s not a legal team I’d ever want to cross paths with.

It’s also not the first time Apple has cried wolf at employees leaving the company to do bigger and better things, while trying to take responsibility for their successes.

seviu•25m ago
This is John Ternus having a beef with Tang Tan. It’s widely known they both competed for the role of CEO. Tim Cook would never have started this.

It shows a level of pettiness and arrogance which I never expected to see from Apple.

I can’t put myself in the mind of John, but he clearly hated Tang.

From outside and with a parent’s perspective this looks like my kids throwing a tantrum.

John must be thinking he is the new Steve Jobs (Steve would definitely do this)

MattDamonSpace•23m ago
Agreed Steve would do this

But the iPhone is the most valuable consumer hardware product on the planet, and the accusations here is “conspiracy to steal” essentially.

Is it really that petty? Apple should be okay with theft of valuable secrets?

jonlucc•20m ago
It's interesting that you say they must have hated each other, but assume only Ternus is acting on that. What makes you think Tan's hatred of Ternus or animosity toward Apple for picking Ternus over him didn't lead Tan to do the alleged behavior?
MichaelZuo•44m ago
It would be very strange for Apple’s legal department to send out formal letters filled with claims on a lark.
nba456_•43m ago
Not really, just slowing down a potential competitor could still be worth it.
ksec•43m ago
Generally speaking, I think Apple tends to win on anything related to ex-employees. I am not sure if this is normal across Big-Tech. But surely is for Apple.

Depending on what is at stake. Example the one with Nuvia and Qualcomm I believe they just settled.

jasode•40m ago
>Does Apple actually have a winnable case

Based on the previous thread, Apple seems to have damning evidence of wrongdoing by the (ex)employees before-and-after they left their positions at Apple: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48865019

Seems very similar to Google/Waymo winning its case against Uber (ex-Googler Anthony Levandowski) stealing corporate data.

Apple has the employees' emails history, the server access logs, etc. Really don't see Apple pursuing this unless they had a mountain of evidence against them.

jamespo•24m ago
So we should "make our economy more dynamic" by encouraging IP theft which will simultaneously discourage genuine research & development?
homarp•6m ago
it worked for China, no?

(and to develop 5G modem too)

lowmagnet•42m ago
In what case is apple a monopoly?
NBJack•42m ago
You may want to read the related articles first. I'm personally quite anti-Apple on several fronts, but the evidence so far seems damning if it holds up in court.
illliillll•17m ago
Let’s try:

> Apple knew a supplier was using child labor but took 3 years to fully cut ties (yahoo.com)

Apple routinely terminates relationships with suppliers when they identify abusive practices, sometimes they’re slow about it.

> Apple's Cooperation with Authoritarian Governments (jessesquires.com)

> Apple removes nearly 100 VPNs used by Russians to bypass censorship (elpais.com)

Apple obeys local laws

> Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA (open-web-advocacy.org)

Apple chooses to maintain control over a specific implementation detail of their platform that a handful of nerds object to.

> Apple defined ICE as a "protected class" in blocking anti-ICE apps (boingboing.net)

The claim made in this headline is just straight up false.

I don’t know, I don’t think their less-than-ideal behaviour is anywhere bad enough to reasonably be described as “evil”. Otherwise, we’re probably all evil.

throw10920•7m ago
Thank you for your work. You spent far more time debunking misinformation than fsflover spent spreading it.
camillomiller•28m ago
A list of very normal capitalistic practices. Borderline, sometimes ruthless, sometimes opportunistic. Evil is enabling genocide in Myanmar, which Meta provenly did. Evil is voluntarily steal millions of artworks for your own benefit, which OpenAI has provenly done. Etc…