My first software job was at a Tae Kwan Do studio who ran their own billing department, and the entire billing half was some weird custom thing written with FoxPro. Not Visual FoxPro, I've never actually used that, but the old school DOS stuff.
I absolutely hated every time I had to touch it and I had hoped that it would die in a fire. I hope Visual FoxPro sucks less.
I shudder at the though of businesses trying to access DBF files on "network drives" across the variety of shitty overlay network technologies that are the norm today. Seamless remote access to applications is the exact recipe Visual FoxPro apps fail at.
It looks cool but I wouldn't want actually work around apps built in it. It would be cool if a client/server database could be transparently shoehorned in to it.
It did, but does it still with AI? Back in the 90's it was crazy painful. I'm not in the same situations as I was back then, but I'm optimistic about the future being better because we have better tools today than we did back then.
Now, who's open sourcing and reviving FileMaker that Apple killed?
With that said, I've never actually used FoxPro. I only had a database as the contract for what my web app was supposed to do.
People used it to write business applications. Like Microsoft Access, or Visual Basic.
It started as a competitor to dBase II/III called FoxBase, and then Microsoft bought it.
Successor - Visual FoxPro: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_FoxPro
I wished almost it was terminal based
All the comments are also inauthentic and weirdly sycophantic reviews from new accounts.
boredjohnny•1h ago
smackeyacky•36m ago
Now your customer has two problems instead of just one.
SequoiaHope•23m ago
ndiddy•27m ago
SequoiaHope•24m ago
Pannoniae•10m ago