I like the project but using Claude sure didn't improve this article.
It's mainstreamed. Spare the rest of us.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canine_discoid_lupus_erythemat...
I do generally agree though that the author should edit or rewrite completely the AI output since he clearly put a lot of effort into the thing he made itself.
I mean, I'm the "critic" that started this thread and my comment doesn't say that, so what exactly is your problem? If it were poor writing for any other reason would you have the same kneejerk defensive reaction that you have about poor AI writing?
Maybe instead of expecting everyone to be good at everything, we cut this guy a little slack and let him use AI to help write?
silverFork•42m ago