Contacts let you see in the dark with your eyes closed

https://scitechdaily.com/from-sci-fi-to-superpower-these-contacts-let-you-see-in-the-dark-with-your-eyes-closed/

108•geox•8mo ago

Comments

bn-l•8mo ago

Very cool but:

> Currently, the contact lenses are only able to detect infrared radiation projected from an LED light source, but the researchers are working to increase the nanoparticles’ sensitivity so that they can detect lower levels of infrared light.

> “There are many potential applications right away for this material. For example, flickering infrared light could be used to transmit information in security, rescue, encryption or anti-counterfeiting settings.”

Hmm

snitch182•8mo ago

Good. I remember a certain video camera operating in the infrared fringe of the visible spectrum. You could see through light clothes. We do not want that again. At all.

magicalhippo•8mo ago

All, or at least nearly all, digital camera sensors are sensitive in the IR. That's why most "normal" digital cameras have IR blocking filters. Security and astrophoto cameras have the filter removed. For astro there's also people who remove the filter manually[1].

[1]: https://camerasnipe.com/how-to-remove-the-ir-filter-from-a-d...

NBJack•8mo ago

That link is kind of a fever dream of information a little ways in. Are you sure you meant to post that?

"First, remove the smartphone camera’s infrared filter as a whiteboard is on the floor. The beginning of the CCD chip is the scar we need to eliminate. Enter the IRF address, and use a hot air gun to remove it and your piece."?

magicalhippo•8mo ago

Thanks for the catch. Was on the phone and in a hurry so didn't read the whole thing carefully, just several sections which looked ok.

Several passages that do not make much sense, looks like weird translation errors or something. Sorry about that.

Here's a proper guide[1] also with some sample post-conversion pictures. Though the specifics do vary from model to model so if you want to try make sure you find a suitable one, LifePixel has a collection[2] of model-specific tutorials for example.

[1]: https://petapixel.com/2014/09/19/in-depth-diy-eos-550d-infra...

[2]: https://www.lifepixel.com/tutorials/infrared-diy-tutorials

baxtr•8mo ago

> In humans, the infrared contact lenses enabled participants to accurately detect flashing morse code-like signals and to perceive the direction of incoming infrared light. “It’s totally clear cut: without the contact lenses, the subject cannot see anything, but when they put them on, they can clearly see the flickering of the infrared light,” said Xue.

Sounds like promising tech but that’s not "seeing in the dark", yet.

Terr_•8mo ago

I wonder if similarly-lackluster results could be achieved by special facepaint.

Kind of like how when you're camping, you can shield your eyes and still know where the campfire is.

rawling•8mo ago

Several recent posts, think this one has the most discussion:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44063051

M95D•8mo ago

Light in visible spectrum is emitted by the contact lenses. There can be no optical focusing for that light. No image formation on the retina. That means the user may see that there is IR light somewhere around, possibly the general direction where it's coming from (left vs right), but that's all. No IR image, not even general shapes.

itishappy•8mo ago

I noticed the same thing, and while the article comments on it, I suspect the comments may be inaccurate:

> Because the contact lenses have limited ability to capture fine details (due to their close proximity to the retina, which causes the converted light particles to scatter), the team also developed a wearable glass system using the same nanoparticle technology, which enabled participants to perceive higher-resolution infrared information.

No, putting the contact closer to the retina would improve imaging, because it would have less distance to scatter. Glasses will not fix this. A potential solution would be implanting these nanoparticles directly above the retina, but that's a significantly more invasive option than what's being described here.

M95D•8mo ago

Well, you could even put them behind the retina. The photoreceptors of the retina are all upside-down, facing the back of the eye.

itishappy•8mo ago

All the benefits with few of the downsides. That's pretty clever!

amelius•8mo ago

You can also focus a pixel by guiding it through a narrow tube, basically cutting off any out-of-focus light. Maybe they use meta-materials to do it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamaterial

hn_throwaway_99•8mo ago

Yeah, the research is interesting, but the headline is, as usual, bs clickbait, also known as "false".

The article also mentions at the end that the contacts are only sensitive enough to detect IR emitted by an LED - they're not sensitive enough to "see" ambient IR. A far cry from "Contacts let you see in the dark with your eyes closed".

constantcrying•8mo ago

You do not "see" in the dark with these lenses in any meaningful way. They just light up in the visible spectrum when infrared light is shone on them.

anticensor•8mo ago

The true solution would be IR, cyan and UVB cones.

harvey9•8mo ago

If it works then this is the product Bob Shaw described in A Wreath of Stars.

Caelus9•8mo ago

if these contact lenses allow you to see better even when your eyes are closed, could this technology be used to help people who are blind or visually impaired? If so, that would be an absolutely incredible project! The potential for improving lives would be huge.

I am happier writing code by hand

AI fatigue Is real and nobody talks about it

RFC 3092 – Etymology of "Foo" (2001)

Running Your Own As: BGP on FreeBSD with FRR, GRE Tunnels, and Policy Routing

GitHub Agentic Workflows

Show HN: It took 4 years to sell my startup. I wrote a book about it

Curating a Show on My Ineffable Mother, Ursula K. Le Guin

Matchlock – Secures AI agent workloads with a Linux-based sandbox

Reverse Engineering Raiders of the Lost Ark for the Atari 2600

The Contagious Taste of Cancer

Dave Farber has died

DoNotNotify is now Open Source

Slop Terrifies Me

Rabbit Ear "Origami": programmable origami in the browser

Beyond agentic coding

Show HN: LocalGPT – A local-first AI assistant in Rust with persistent memory

Kolakoski Sequence

OpenClaw Is Changing My Life

The Legacy of Daniel Kahneman: A Personal View (2025)

Why E cores make Apple silicon fast

A11yJSON: A standard to describe the accessibility of the physical world

How to squeeze a lexicon (2001) [pdf]

We mourn our craft

SectorC: A C Compiler in 512 bytes (2023)

I write games in C (yes, C) (2016)

The Architecture of Open Source Applications (Volume 1) Berkeley DB

LLMs as the new high level language

Roger Ebert Reviews "The Shawshank Redemption" (1999)

Show HN: Fine-tuned Qwen2.5-7B on 100 films for probabilistic story graphs

Software factories and the agentic moment