Sounds like promising tech but that’s not "seeing in the dark", yet.
Kind of like how when you're camping, you can shield your eyes and still know where the campfire is.
> Because the contact lenses have limited ability to capture fine details (due to their close proximity to the retina, which causes the converted light particles to scatter), the team also developed a wearable glass system using the same nanoparticle technology, which enabled participants to perceive higher-resolution infrared information.
No, putting the contact closer to the retina would improve imaging, because it would have less distance to scatter. Glasses will not fix this. A potential solution would be implanting these nanoparticles directly above the retina, but that's a significantly more invasive option than what's being described here.
bn-l•6h ago
> Currently, the contact lenses are only able to detect infrared radiation projected from an LED light source, but the researchers are working to increase the nanoparticles’ sensitivity so that they can detect lower levels of infrared light.
> “There are many potential applications right away for this material. For example, flickering infrared light could be used to transmit information in security, rescue, encryption or anti-counterfeiting settings.”
Hmm
snitch182•5h ago
magicalhippo•1h ago
[1]: https://camerasnipe.com/how-to-remove-the-ir-filter-from-a-d...